找回密码
 加入地震坛
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 6269|回复: 3

南极磁场丢失?!---一个个值得研究的现象

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-6-22 18:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=804475330

  查看文章   
南茜对地球轻微向左倾斜和地球南极磁场暂时消失与强震关系的分析(翻译完毕)2010-04-15 12:48

Comment by Nancy Lieder 10 hours ago
No, no, not from the Zetas. I Nancy did pattern analysis and not to load the whole newsletter feature here (too long) here's the conclusions, when the S Pole missing, when it did not.
不,不是根据齐塔人的,我自己进行了模式分析,而且不会发布成新闻简报(太长了)。下面的结论,当地球南极(磁场)消失的时候和南极磁场存在的时候的两种结果。


Prior to the 8.8 magnitude quake in Chile on February 27, the magnetosphere went from a normal appearance to loss of its S Pole. As noted on Issue 176
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue176.htm
of this newsletter, a decided lean to the left was noted in the weeks following the magnitude 8.8 quake in Chile. GPS malfunction was noted at that time too, and in the days prior to the Chile quake.
在2月27日智力8.8级地震以前,地球磁气圈从正常的状态变成了失去了南极磁场。这在176期新闻简报提及过。在这个新闻简报里,在智利的8.8级地震发生后的几个星期内注意到了地球出现了向左倾斜现象;也在那个时候注意到了GPS出现故障,就是在智利地震发生之前的几天。


IMAGE: Chile 8.8 S Pole
图片:智利8.8级地震与地球南极磁场

The Mediterranean had unexplained rogue waves on March 3 and March 10 also, as noted in Issue 178
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue178.htm
of this newsletter, the result of a silent roll of the African continent pushing the Mediterranean floor down north of Algeria. Loss of the Earth’s S Pole was noted on March 1 and March 2. The rolling of the African Plate is considered a silent maneuver, thought no less devastating than a quake in its effect. This is the second time the loss of the S Pole on the magnetosphere was associated with significant plate movements.
3月3日和3月10日地中海都发生了出人意料的滔天巨浪。这在178号里的新闻简报中提到过。http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue178.htm 。在这个新闻简报里,非洲大陆寂静无声的滑动把地中海板块的底部往阿尔及利亚北部之下推挤。在3月1号和3月2号也发现了南极磁场丢失之事。非洲板块的滑动被认为是一个静默的动作,不比同等效力的地震造成的破坏小。这是第二次地球南极磁场磁气圈丢失现象,并且与显著的板块移动相关联。



IMAGE: Mediterranean S Pole
图片:地中海与地球南极磁场

The Zetas explained that a lean to the left is a temporary adjustment of the Earth, to evade the push against her magnetic N Pole by the aggressive and larger planetary body, Planet X, and that a reaction of a bounce to the right could also be expected during such times. Both the lean to the left and the bounce back are proving to be stressful times for the Earth.
齐塔人解释了地球向左倾斜是地球在作临时调整,以避开更大的天体,即行星X期压性的北极磁场。在此期间地球作出反应,向右边反弹回来也是可以被预料到的。向左倾斜和反弹回来证明了地球本身正承受着压力。


Then a lull ensued, between March 8–21, when no decided lean was noted and only minor quakes occurred. This was reflected in the magnetosphere readings. No loss of the S Pole was noted during this lull. Keeping count, lull with no loss of the S Pole = 1, significant plates movement with loss of S Pole = 2.
然后接下来在3月8日到3月21日之间是一个很平静的时期,没有注意到地球显著地倾斜,而且只发生了些小地震。这在磁气圈的读数上反映了出来;在这段平静的时间内没有地球南极磁场丢失的现象。继续记数,即很平静,并没南极磁场丢失就记做“1”;而有显著的板块移动,并有南极磁场丢失记作“2”。


IMAGE: Lull
图片:平静(时期)

The lull stopped on March 21-27, when the lean to the left returned, intermittently. During this period, there were quakes and signs of stress on the live seismographs in the Caribbean and continued hammering along the Andes in S America, but nothing major, as noted in Issue 178
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue178.htm
of this newsletter. The magnetosphere reflected this stress by the loss of the Earth’s S Pole repeatedly, on March 25 and 27, 2010. This is the third time the loss of the S Pole on the magnetosphere was associated with significant plate movements or plate distress. Lull with no loss of the S Pole = 1, significant plates movement or distress with loss of S Pole = 3.
在3月21日到3月27日这段时间,平静被打破了。不时地又出现了地球向左倾斜现象。在这段时间里,加勒比有地震,此处的实时地震检测仪显示了压力信号,沿着南美的安第斯山脉有持续的地震,但是并没有大地震。这在178号的新闻简报中提到过。
2010年3月25日和3月27日,磁气圈反复地反映出了由于地球南极磁场丢失所承受的压力;这是第三次地球南极磁场丢失,反应出磁气圈与显著的板块移动或者板块压力有着关联。平静并且没有地球南极磁场丢失就记做“1”;南磁极消失,并且有显著的板块移动或承受了压力就记做“3”。


IMAGE: Andes/Caribbean S Pole
图片:安第斯山脉和加勒比与地球南极磁场

Then another lull ensued, from March 28-April 1. Neither the loss of a S Pole nor a twisted magnetosphere occurred, though the magnetosphere did show it was receiving blasts. Lull with no loss of the S Pole = 2, significant plates movement or distress with loss of S Pole = 3.
然后又是一段平静期,即从3月28日至4月1日这段时间。没有发生南极磁场消失或者磁气圈扭曲现象,虽然磁气圈表现出它正遭受着冲击。平静并且没有南极磁场丢失就记做“2”;有显著的板块移动或者压力,并伴有南极磁场消失就记做“3”。



IMAGE: Lull
图片:平静期



Following this lull we returned to a lean to the left on April 2-3. After that, perhaps due to a bounce back to the right, two significant quakes occurred – the 7.2 in Baja on April 4 and the 7.8 in Sumatra on April 6. These quakes are significant in that both times the live seismographs went black, showing global magma sloshing. And the magnetosphere shows the stress of blasts with a twist on April 7. However, the S Pole did NOT go missing. Lull or lean with no loss of the S Pole = 3, significant plates movement or distress with loss of S Pole = 3.
平静之后我们又在4月2日到3日迎来了地球向左倾斜。在这之后,或许因为地球向右弹回来,两个严重的地震就发生了----4月4号南下加尼福尼亚州的7.2级地震和4月6日苏门答腊的7.8级地震。这些地震严重到实时地震检测仪都变黑了,显示着全球的岩浆都在搅动。磁气圈显示出了受到冲击的压力,并在4月7日的时候扭曲了。然而,南极磁场并没有消失。所以,平静或者地球向左倾斜,但并没有南极磁场消失就记作“3”;有显著的板块移动或压力,并伴有南极磁场消失也记做“3.”。


IMAGE: Baja 7.2/Sumatra 7.8
图片:南下加你福尼亚州7.2级和苏门答腊7.8级地震

Following the Baja and Sumatra quakes, a lean to the left again ensued on April 8-9, but eased by April 11. Significantly, the live seismographs were calm, showing lack of stress. The magnetosphere did not show a missing S Pole, and no significant quakes ensued. At the end of the lean, the Solomons had a 7.1 quake which registered worldwide on the live seismographs, though they did not go entirely black. Once again, the lack of a S Pole was not present, showing this magnetosphere change might be useful as a predictive guide. Lull or lean with no loss of the S Pole = 4, significant plates movement or distress with loss of S Pole = 3.
在南下吉尼福利亚州和苏门答腊地震后,在4月8日到 9日地球又向左边倾斜了,但是在4月11日得到了缓解。而这次实时地震仪却很平静,没有显示压力。磁气圈也没有显示南极磁场消失,接下来也没有重大的地震。在这次倾斜末尾,所罗门遭受了7.1级地震,这在全世界的实时地震仪上都有记录----虽然它们没有全部变黑。再一次,南极磁场消失的情况没有出现,这说明磁气圈的改变或许是很有帮助的,可作为预测的指导。现在,平静期或者地球向左边倾斜,但南极磁场没有消失记录为“4”;有显著的板块移动或者压力,伴随着南极磁场消失记录为“3”。



                              (感谢热心网友TOO'NY提供本文翻译!)
 楼主| 发表于 2010-6-25 07:47 | 显示全部楼层
如果数据准确,那地球磁场的偶磁极本质就会受到极大地挑战。因为一个磁场如果说是偶极的,那它的磁极磁场强度必须相同的。
点评回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-6-25 08:09 | 显示全部楼层
不是很明白。
点评回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-6 05:10 | 显示全部楼层
就像一块磁铁的南北极,不可能一个极磁场强度高、另一个磁场强度低。
点评回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入地震坛

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|地震坛 ( 京ICP备14033744号 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-3 21:46

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表